Direct vs Regular Mutual Fund Calculator

Compare direct and regular mutual fund expense ratios using the same contributions, gross return assumption and investment period.

Adjust your plan

Enter an exact value or use a slider. Your result updates instantly.

Formula, example and assumptions
Direct corpus minus regular corpus₹10,68,188.58

Equal investments in both plans

Indian rupees
Indian rupees

Return before fees and plan expenses

%

Do not enter a published historical NAV return: fund expenses are already included in it.

%
%

Your result

Local calculation
Direct corpus minus regular corpus₹10,68,188.58About ₹10.68 lakh

Compare projected totals from equal investments with different annual expense ratios. The fee-related reduction includes fees and growth lost on that money over the term.

Investment period in years
20
Assumed annual return before expenses
12 %
Direct-plan annual expense ratio
0.5 %
Regular-plan annual expense ratio
1.5 %
See how this is calculated

Result breakdown

Direct-plan corpus
₹85,99,671.43 About ₹86 lakh
Regular-plan corpus
₹75,31,482.85 About ₹75.31 lakh
Contributions in each plan
₹24,00,000.00 About ₹24 lakh
Direct-plan fee-related corpus drag
₹5,98,902.13 About ₹5.99 lakh
Regular-plan fee-related corpus drag
₹16,67,090.71 About ₹16.67 lakh
Modelled direct annual return after fees
11.4414%
Modelled regular annual return after fees
10.3325%
Projection over timeValues progress from ₹698.60 to ₹10,68,188.58.
Year 1: corpus differenceYear 20: corpus difference
View direct and regular plan projections

Swipe or scroll to see every column.

Direct and regular plan projections
YearContributed in each planDirect corpusRegular corpus

Use an assumed return before expenses. Published NAV returns already include expenses. This model accrues a constant annual expense ratio daily over 365-day years; corpus drag includes foregone growth, not just fees paid.

Check the inputs and method

These are your current inputs, not the worked example further down the page.

Monthly SIP in each plan
₹10,000
Initial lump sum in each plan
₹0
Investment period in years
20
Assumed annual return before expenses
12 %
Direct-plan annual expense ratio
0.5 %
Regular-plan annual expense ratio
1.5 %

Method

Monthly growth factor = (1 + gross annual return ÷ 100)^(1/12) × (1 − annual expense ratio ÷ 36,500)^(365/12). Apply the factor to the same initial lump sum and start-of-month contributions in both plans. Fee-related corpus difference = direct corpus − regular corpus.

Read the worked example and assumptions

How this calculation works

Direct and regular plans of the same fund generally share an investment portfolio, while their expenses differ. This comparison holds the gross return and every contribution constant, then applies the two user-entered expense ratios. It displays the resulting corpus gap and each plan’s drag relative to the same projection without expenses. It does not estimate the cost or suitability of switching an existing holding.

Monthly growth factor = (1 + gross annual return ÷ 100)^(1/12) × (1 − annual expense ratio ÷ 36,500)^(365/12). Apply the factor to the same initial lump sum and start-of-month contributions in both plans. Fee-related corpus difference = direct corpus − regular corpus.

Worked example

This example uses illustrative inputs. Your current result is shown above.

For a ₹1,00,000 lump sum, no monthly SIP and a 0% gross return over one year, a 0% expense ratio leaves ₹1,00,000. A 1% annual ratio, accrued daily in this model, leaves about ₹99,004.97: a corpus difference of ₹995.03.

Assumptions and limits

  • Both plans hold the same underlying portfolio and have the same gross return, initial investment, contribution amounts and contribution dates.
  • Expenses are approximated as a constant fraction of assets deducted daily, using 365 equal days a year. Actual NAV calculations and changing expense ratios can differ.
  • The expense ratio is applied once. Published NAV returns already include expenses and must not be used as a gross-return input.
  • Corpus drag includes expenses and the growth those amounts no longer earn; it is not a statement of fees actually paid.
  • Taxes, exit loads, distributor advice value and the consequences of switching an existing holding are not modelled. Returns are uncertain.

Questions people ask

Can I enter a fund’s historical published return?

Not as the gross return here. Historical NAV returns already reflect fund expenses. Deducting an expense ratio from those returns again would count that cost twice. Enter a hypothetical return before expenses instead.

Is the corpus difference the fee paid to a distributor?

No. It is the modelled difference between ending balances, including compounding. An expense ratio can include several scheme costs, and the corpus gap is not a distributor commission statement.

What if the two ratios are equal or the regular ratio is lower?

Equal ratios produce identical results. If the entered regular ratio is lower, the regular projection will be higher and the direct-minus-regular difference will be negative. The labels do not force a winner.

Related calculators